WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE EXPANSION
The observations of the universe made through
different instruments indicate is in constant expansion. The explanation that
the cause of it is a big explosion that is has been called , Big Bang is
widespread. Initially thought an explosion Atomic but given the rapidity with
which are completed plus other negative characteristics for the purpose, has
been abandoned the idea. It follows the scientific world without finding an
acceptable answer. From time to time, Hawking has also hinted it, appears a
cold source option but it has not consensus it achieves impact as a solution.
Some detected radiation seem to confirm the theory that in the vicinity of the
beginning there was one or more explosions. This is not closing the posibility
for other solution.
To the dark energy, that measured by media
satellite known covering 68.3% of the total energy available in the universe,
he is credited with a sharing in the expansion. Its origin is not
known. Though, the same happens with other events without explanation,
there are who advocates a source linked to the beginning of the universe
The philosophy is not the appropriate discipline to
intervene in the myriad of information and data provided by observers of the
cosmos today. If deserves attention on a key issue: the existence. Absorbed
by physical issues the scientific world has sidestepped the solution requiring
the philosophy and which is, no doubt, essential to explain the endurance of
things.
Countless studies made about the universe, but I
know of no one who believes that the existence is a physical problem. The
response of the philosophy of physics says that a thing exists when it occupies
a place in space for a while. The response assumed that there must be a
system in existence that will make possible the given answer, that system for
some logical, for a variety of philosophers and studious people is
space-time. It is also in evidence that has brought to the philosophy of
speculation to root it, rather together it, with the world of physical science,
and that the concept of existence which we noted is shared between philosophy
and physics, because it takes place in universe . Since its inception it is
as well as physical phenomenon , existential phenomenon .
Thoughts are not physical things: images, memories,
reflections, ideas, all they inhabit the mind and collapse by the
time. They are not real, they do not exist as such. Their presence is
a product of the brain-mental activity.
As physical reality the phenomenon of existence should
claims that the system of existence is able enough to justify different states
that crosses the existence: past, present and future.
While not determined how it is that it does, if it
is that you can justify the states of past and present, the Big Bang should be
discarded as a system of existence of physical things.
Can physics find how the expansion occurs? It is a
fundamental challenge that while our astrophysicists are dedicated to
investigate characteristics complementary of the universe, those that we know
them by means of radiation, or adjusting to theories without full confirmation,
or developing formulas mathematical born and developed without a physical
object description clear and specific, it is not possible.
An analysis of the expansion makes it possible to
determine logically the requirements that must be met by an expanding universe,
they are:
1. -able to constantly expand. From the
beginning or origin whose certainty is given by the nature of the expansion,
until a collapse not defined yet but has also included in its nature.
Although they are not intrinsic requirements, you
can give attention:
5 a plausible
explanation of immense areas of the universe that seem empty of all sorts of
stars.
6 explain why some measurements of the speed of
expansion show accelerations coming to duplicate other
Can the reader, whether scientist, astronomer, or
simply an enlightened person through all the physical, from quantum to
classical theories, including the theory of relativity or any of the phenomena
more strangers who appear in nature, which will not find, how in fact not
found, none that even meets a few of the six raised requirements, except one
who appears with great frequency and all corners of the universe. I refer to
the electromagnetic movement that has many different applications and which
would meet all requirements requested. I invite you to consider whether this is
the phenomenon, if not in its typical conformation, if as belonging to a
phenomenon with the same characteristics that have the electromagnetic
movement, which is suitable to explain the origin and spread of the universe.
Let's go a little deeper, for that matter, let's
start with the origin. Its beginning, that of electromagnetic movement, is
quantum as argued by specialized writers. Light, for example, the most known
and useful of nature's phenomena is a quantum phenomenon also in its origin, to
such an extent that Feinman, Nobel Prize winner of physics 1965 begins his book
of physics, in the third volume that deals with quantum physics, with the
following paragraph: "Quantum mechanics is the description of the behavior
of matter and light in all its details and, in particular, of events at the
atomic scale." Therefore, it is plausible that the electromagnetic
universe that I propose has begun in the original quantum universe just as
light did in the quantum world. It is good to remember that light is a
phenomenon that moves in the void as a diffusion of energy without matter, the
same requirement observed by astronomers also in the cosmos. Currently we
receive light reflections from a few light years away, so it is not strange
that the universe is spreading in a similar way. Electromagnetic radiation uses
waves for its diffusion, it is a wave movement, and it is also, because it is
wave, a phenomenon that advances by means of waves of attack that leave in this
way the stillness of waves that disappear. Is not this phenomenon, one that
buries the present, formed by the frontier waves, leaving them behind,
overcome, as if quiet, in the past?
There are arguments that could be resolved on the
basis of this universe formed by an electromagnetic movement.
-The cause of expansion is obvious if we accept
that the universe is the result of an electromagnetic movement. Don't need
no explosion. But this solution does not mean that we should discard, that
already initiated the formation of matter, by modes explained and tested by
science with enough verisimilitude, this matter would have collided with other
parts and caused high temperatures and pressures.
-Already checked as this movement is the only
known, suitable to represent the states of the time.
-Empty areas are consistent with the quietude areas
of the electromagnetic movement. Making a physical interpretation we can
say that the past was there plunged.
-The existence has always been a proprietary
concept of philosophy. A mistake has been to consider it that way, because
the existence occurs when one thing stays in a place for a time, in short, when
in space-time. Space-time stopped being a philosophical chimera to become
in the more important concept who has discovered Einstein, according to
Bertrand Russell, says in the ABC of relativity.
- It is not the philosophy of physics that is
indicated to validate current physical theories. But it can expose logical
arguments. For a better understanding of which I recommend the reader review
the article on the origin of logic and mathematics in this blog. There the
limitations of mathematics are exposed, which have been given a general
validity when they have been developed for specific and precise physical objects
that do not represent physical reality. These reflections limit relativity as
valid only for a static universe, which is what its author wanted. On the other
hand, quantum physics is logically valid, it should only be noted that it does
not have a physical definition and therefore this validation does not refer to
concordance with a description of quantum events but rather that the
mathematics used are appropriate to describe the disorder of some erratic
particles.
- If we locate ourselves in any point of the
universe conceived in the way we propose and we intend to measure the speed of
expansion of it, we must accept that there is a center and we may direct our
astronomical gaze to nearby areas, on the same side as we are on the side that
the expansion is taking place, in which case our result will be what we are
looking for, the result will be net. But if we direct our astronomical gaze to
an area on the other side of the center or origin of the electromagnetic
movement, we will measure our velocity plus the velocity of the other side,
that is, a number greater than the first, and even double.
Current
researchers have focused on debatable data. They give for sure the idea of a
great explosion, the Big Bang, taking care of preference to that the explosion
seems to justify the expansion, without observing the defects that an analysis
of group, like this, make appear. Many accept relativity ignoring that it was
elaborated for a static universe. They believe that the FLRW metric solves this
situation, but they do not take into account that Einstein himself only
reluctantly approved it, ten years later, when he did not find a better answer,
and above all, ignoring that it is also a study done for a static universe
which provides mobility without changing nature.
The expansion is a phenomenon different from the
stationary phenomenon. Let us think that the consideration of time as an
additional dimension can give certain mathematical returns, but it does not
replace the true time of the expansion that, in this phenomenon, must be seen
as something independent, merging with space, both physically in space -time,
as cerebrally in the minds of human beings.
Comments
Post a Comment