THE BIG BANG DID NOT REACH THE EXPANSION
THE BIG
BANG DID NOT REACH THE EXPANSION
It is important to make a review of the events that lead to the theory of
the Big Bang.
-In 1905 Einstein proposes the theory of special
relativity. According to her the space and time are relative to the
observer. Discards the conception of space and time of Isaac Newton.
-In 1915 the same Einstein
presented his theory of General Relativity appropriate to a stationary universe that includes the
ideas of special relativity. For each point
of space-time, the Einstein field equation describes how the space-time curve by action on
the matter and it has the
form of an equality between a tensor of curvature at the point and a tensor
that describes the distribution of matter around the point local. Einstein proposes 10 field
equations. It is important to remember that that date was not known that
the universe was expanding, this Einstein does not take into account this
fundamental quality of the universe.
-In 1922 and 1924 Friedman published two articles in the German
journal of physics, which contain the first solutions to equations of
relativity field. To resolve them using a special metric that is today
known as the Friedman-Lemaitre-Robertson - Walker metric. Is called "metric" because it is
mathematically a metric
tensor specified at each point of space time [i.e. a
tensor field]. In this metric is
accepted that space-time changes at each point with the passage of time and
space can be extended as it does not remain stationary. This calculation
is contrary to the theory that proposes the same Einstein. It must be the reason why this Sage takes almost ten years
to accept it. The effect is crucial because will consider this way the
theory of relativity acquires some expansionary effects that accommodate it to
the experienced reality.
- 1927 Lemaitre proposes for the first time that
the universe is expanding. It is based on the galaxies move away. In
the article, Lemaitre proposed that the big bang originates in an atom which
called primeval Atom, but little impact on scientific methods. Between 24 and October 29, 1927
was held, in Brussels, the fifth Solvay Congress, Georges Lemaitre decided to talk
with Einstein about his article, but told him that although the calculations
were correct, its Physics was "abominable". Smelled of creation
-In 1929 Hubble proposes the same as Lemaitre and
is accepted by much of the scientific community. So far, many believe that
he was the first to talk about expansion.
-Many of the scholars of these themes think that
expansion originated at a point of infinite density and temperature
gigantic. A zero point at infinite temperature says Hawking. While some
propose an atomic explosion the main keepers of the theory do not discriminate
about class. They are limited to sustain expansion as a fact, without
venture how or the why its origin was given, nor indicate how he is maintaining
the expansion. Which is considered as the most important update of the
expansion is thought to this point of infinite temperature cooled to 10000
million degrees only in a second during which its volume was increased in a
colossal way and the temperature fell to only 100 0 million degrees
hundred seconds later, always under the supervision of the two theories more
important at present, relativity and quantum.
The expansion properties
-Space-time in the expansion takes place
independent of the observers. Its expansive rhythm is related to intense
actor of the phenomenon. Is also deductible, for
simple abstraction, who separated observers witness the events differently
because they are located in different space-time positions which expand by his
own ways, not because the time and space are relativity to them.
-We must find the engine of space-time as a real
and constant physical strength, able to initiate and maintain the
process. In addition, this is of the greatest importance, impulsive force
is or not, it exists by its manifestations and must be related to gravity
because it is can not ignore the fact that this force is formed in contact with
matter.
-Two items of space-time are different each other,
so that man assimilates them differently: space sees it through the vision
sense, that explains your competition using properties of optics that our organism
has developed. On the other hand, time is a deduction from the brain that
psychology studies, and that is subjected to a mental construct that takes more
than seven years to bloom. The two merge together forming another physical be,
distinct from its contributors, the space-time. Space-time can not be
explained by way of a mathematical
operation, this is risky in pretending that they are 4 dimensions of the same
class.
-Space-time takes the constituent elements of any
site, exactly the same to as a hydrogen atom is built with random collaboration
of a proton and an electron by the quantum world. Just do not know where
are the space and time before merging. And we do not know a specific cause that
explains fusion. If this occurs randomly or is a creation.
-The expansion of space-time facilitates the
existence of physical things, since they exist when they are in one place for a
while. Space-time is, for this reason, a system of existence of real
things, which must conform to the limitations of it. A system that houses
all the real things for coherence applies to itself. No one escapes that
the expansion system of existence, to be sufficient should contain physically
the States of the time, this implies that the phenomenon that causes must be
true and really allow the transit of the three States of the time by.
-Our human capacities are in accordance with the
expansion: perception, imagination, thought and reflection is appropriate to
appreciate indirectly this becoming space-time when we observe transient
events, when we observe in our mind instantly is going, when we imagine
something, when we think and when we reflect. Using this last function of
the mind can bring to our present events of the past, remembering them, view in
mind that they tend to fade so we must make special efforts to counter his
tendency to disappear, which happens not only because of the transience of
life, by the limitations of neurological function, but also by the properties
of the existence of things.
Conclusion the physical universe needs a physical
origin, a known phenomenon that meets the requirements of the expansion that we
have pointed out as part of a real event. It doesn't look for explanations
that do not take into account the expansion properties because this is to
ignore the problem without analyzing the whole universe and without respecting
the capacity of reflection that distinguishes us as human beings.
The Big Bang does not comply with the properties of
the expansion. That's an absurd thought to be the origin of the universe.
Is there any phenomenon that is able to explain the
expansion and the States of the time? If there is one. What I
describe in another article, as the origin of the universe temporal space.
Comments
Post a Comment